for a world of work without harassment, discrimination, violence, harassment and bullying!
court dates ... petitions ... Law and Justice .... ..... AGG TV shows ... Dignity of the human performance ... .... sentences ... actions .... stories ... Products ...
"A job that pleases you is not working, but the spice of life."
Eleonore van der Straten-Sternberg
Even disabled people today as in the "war on and around the workplace," harassed and humiliated (given your investment 1 Attechment in that case, Mark F.). Now just fall for disabled workers, in particular for Hartz IV recipients more costs. However, bullying must in particular - do victims here continue the humiliation, alone by the current ALG II / Hartz IV-legislation for the disabled. So please, all consider whether you Please do not petition the "additional costs for disabled people" support.
The concern:
unemployment benefit II: More work for disabled people
Submitted by: WA on Monday 18 June 2007
The petitioner requests to disabled people who are in receipt of benefit of Book II of the Social Code, generally an added expense is recognized to be able to bear costs resulting from the disability.
Reason:
, the so-called Hartz IV laws established social assistance and unemployment together. The financial services to be provided were a lump sum in both laws. The disabled person as recipients of benefits according to SGB XII (welfare) is replaced in retirement because of age or full disability liquidated additional needs, as well as receive the container. M. with benefits paid under the § 54 SGB XII (benefits for participation in working life) an additional requirement. In contrast to recipients of benefits under SGB XII is the beh. M. as beneficiaries under SGB II, only then an additional requirement, if services for participation in working life according to § 33 SGB IX is provided. Does the beh. M. as a recipient of benefits under SGB II, but not even then he receives an additional requirement recognized where they participate in a work opportunity to § 16.3 of Book II - has (1 € job). In my view, the beh. M. principle then participation in working life, if he pursues a job or suitable employment. The costs, such as the transport of people with walking difficulties to the work place / home for disabled by a car service or taxi are not to deny the rule set. Not to mention the costs arising from the SGB IX vested right of the container. M. result of participation in the life of society. Why the beh. M. to the performance requirements of SGB II and SGB IX is treated differently, is for the person concerned does not understand.
The road goes on www.bundestag.de on the committees and then petition the Committee on public petitions. Links to Word can not live always activate. The petition may be supported until 15.08.2007. Thank you.
Note: The last petition of appeal Newsletter 28 is that at the moment with 8490 co-signer is very good and the interest in the subject is vast. http://itc.napier.ac.uk/e-Petition/bundestag/view_petition.asp?PetitionID=464
a bullying case
http://www.spiegel-online.de/wirtschaft/0, 1518, 490,634.00 html
Please continue to support.
http://adam-stiftung.de, http://www.mobbing-seminare.com, http://www.arbeitsrecht-seminare.com, http:// www.we-help-us-selbst.de http://milanstation.de; http://mobbing-gegner.de, http://blog.mobbing-gegner.de, http://forum.mobbing-gegner.de, http://aktionrechtefuerkinder.de, http://wiki.mobbing-gegner.de; http://www.mein-parteibuch.de
http://www. afa-spd-ahrweiler.de /
0 comments:
Post a Comment